Ottoman empire vs mughal empire the ottoman and mughal empires were two of the most successful empires to ever come together however, in their dominance there was many similarities as well as differences. The ottoman, safavid, and mughal societies all relied on bureaucracies that drew inspiration from the steppe traditions of turkish and mogol people and from the heritage of islam, they adopted similar policies, they looked for ways to keep peace in their societies which were made up of different religious and ethnic backgrounds, and they were. A tale of three empires: mughals, ottomans, and habsburgs in a comparative context sanjay subrahmanyam (bio) the recent spate of writings about empire—following on the emergence of the unipolar american system at the end of the cold war, and further stimulated by the wars in afghanistan and iraq after september 2001—has left those of us who. The ottoman, safavid, and mughal empires were forces to be reckoned with back in the day being powerful entities, their rise was paved with military prowess, religious tolerance, and having meritocratic systems, though this is not always the case. The ottoman, safavid, and mughal dynasties established control over turkey, iran, and india respectively, in large part due to a chinese invention - gunpowder in large part, the successes of the western empires depended on advanced firearms and cannons.
Safavids in comparison to the ottomans and mughals neither the wealth nor longevity safavids did not gradually extend their territory over successive generations (mostly ottomans. The safavids were the shortest lived, being overthrown in the 17th century the mughals lost most of their power in the 18th century but lingered until the mid 19th the ottomans undertook reforms and lasted into the 20th century.
The best comparative book is stephen dale's the muslim empires of the ottomans, safavids and mughals it's a bit dated and is particularly weak on the safavids, however it's a bit dated and is particularly weak on the safavids, however. Islamic gunpowder empires provides readers with a history of islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of islam's three greatest empires—the ottomans (centered in what is now turkey), the safavids (in modern iran), and the mughals (ruling the indian subcontinent. The ottoman, safavid, and mughal empires all reached their peaks between the 16 th and 17 th centuries combined, the empires spanned from egypt, across the middle east and persia, all the way to india. The ottoman-safavid war of 1623-1639 was the last of a series of conflicts fought between the ottoman empire and safavid persia, then the two major powers of western asia, over control of mesopotamia.
Ottomans feared the safavids and their propaganda twelver shiism religion in the safavid empire that was promoted by shah ismail , branch of islam that stressed that there were twelve perfect religious leaders after muhammad and that the twelfth went into hiding and would return someday shah ismail spread this variety through me safavid empire. The ottoman and safavid empires, known as gunpowder empires, differed in first, the ottomans: the ottoman government was an absolute monarchy that lost touch with the people over time. the safavid, mughal, and ottoman empires all depended in some way on the allegiance of non-muslims to the empire the ottoman emperors were kinder on their conquered people, and the main separation between muslims and non-muslims in the empire was the tax on the dhimmis (non-muslims.
The safavids had territorial claims over kandahar since the reign of shah tahmaspthe overthrow of humayun, the mughal emperor, is known to have gained the support of shah tahmasp in return for his permission to allow the safavids to capture kandahar. This feature is not available right now please try again later. Indeed it is interesting to note that military administration was a major failing of the mughal administration, something that is very different from the ottoman and safavid empires, especially considering its highly centralised nature and its knowledge of ottoman and safavid systems. The muslim empires of the ottomans, safavids, and mughals between 1453 and 1526 muslims founded three major states in the mediterranean, iran, and south asia: respectively the ottoman.
The ottomans, safavids and mughals followed similar economic policies and their merchants interacted as commodities were exchanged22agriculture was the main source of income followed by transit trade in indian spices through the red sea route or the export of manufactured communities like silk and cotton. Islamic empires ottoman safavid mughal age of gunpowder empires 1450 - 1800 changed the balance of power this term applies to a number of states, all of which. Ottoman empire vs - ottoman vs mughals essay introduction mughal empire the ottoman and mughal empires were two of the most successful empires to ever come together mughal empire the ottoman and mughal empires were two of the most successful empires to ever come together.
The ottoman empire decline in the 17th century because of many of the same reasons as the mughal decline the size of the empire played an important part because it put strain on communication, trade, and it was hard to control. Despite their differences, both empires still maintained a connection with the europeans in trade through their commercial cities, where the mughals were most respected for their spice trade, while the safavids were respected for their trade in carpets and leather goods. The safavid dynasty (/ ˈ s ɑː f ə v ɪ d / persian: دودمان صفوی dudmān e safavi) was one of the most significant ruling dynasties of iran, often considered the beginning of modern iranian history.